Eboostr forum software#
With 32g ram(leaving 8g free), you can use eboostr+supercache, to cache most software that you using everyday.Įboostr has learned your habbits, loading windows/ playing mw4+bf3/ running firefox/photoshop etc.īut if you load a new game today. Learns you history(daily) n load files on faster media, check to see if its in cache data first, if so loads from it, instead of slower media(hdd), then put its in cache data if used offen(on next reboot/rebuild)Ĭaching data is about hit n misses, the cache data is faster than acessing a miss, and what we want to do is reduce a miss down to a low number.
Eboostr forum pro#
Supercache 5= advance disk cache program(better than built in windows one)Ĭaches files 2nd time they load (like built in ram buffer on hdd etc)Įboostr pro v4.5=prefetech caching software(better than built in one in windows) If the ssd dies (for caching) no data lost from hdd+ unlimited reads from ssd works even if you just use a ssd to cache a hdd too.(1 ssd) only Its only good if the cache media is slower than the read cache location.Īnyway (by splitting my ssd raid into 2 volumns) the 2nd volumn can be used as a cache via eboostr So if data is cache in the i-ram, it runs at 130mb/sec, much slower than c:\ (on the ssd raid 0 (800mb/sec) id like to assign the 4g iram to the hdd and the 20g of ssd in raid 0 to the hdd, as well, as the 8 main memory too,Īnd id like the main memory 4(g) to cache the c:\ ssd in raid) Ram as 2000-3000+ mb/sec access time(thats main memory4g+6 primo ram drive) Only thing it cant do, it assing what cache type to what drive, ieĤg ram is use as cache +(ram drive 8g(treads it like a physical drive) via primo ult ram drive +4g ram(iram)Īll cache is use to cache my c ssd raid-800mb/sec) and ,my e drive (2tb hit 7200rmp -90mb/sec avg) and 20g of ssd in raid 0(800mb/sec) 2nd volumn, intel raid. Im using it to cache(prefetch) my raid 0 (3x ssd) (helps wear n tear) helps reduce load times+ wear n tear on original source media duplicate file from source to cached locations(ssd/hdd/usb3/raid ssd/hdd) read can set unlimited cache (hdd/ssd/ssd in raid/hdd in raid) can set cache on/off for drives+ paths+ extensions type Marvel controller is slower in real life than the intel raid controller(even if hdd is in non raid)Įboostr has more control options for tweaking(pro v4.5) The annoying thing is that I use a PERC 5 raid card for my video "archives" and it needed the "pin mod" otherwise I only saw 8G of the 16G installed. When I reinstall I'd love to see the speed. When I'm booting windows it still acesses the HDD, but it dropped my bloated Win7 boot time from about 2 mins to 60 seconds. It can also be added after the fact without having to nuke windows.
I think the SSD cacheing is good way of getting value from what you have already. It's funny to watch Win7 users with SSD's boot windows only to not be able to browse the internet, cause IPV6 is still trying to get an address from a (non-existing) IPV6 server. Lastly, if the main thing you are after is windows boot speed just stop all the crap loading at startup. Īnd then you have the "giant" steam/valve dir.
Eboostr forum install#
Now which letter do I install this on? Oh damn. Iv tested all 3 setups (6 months), eboostr safest, n caches you files without data loss(read only boost), but does not help in booting windows faster, after windows loads, it starts to work, speed up acess)Įboostr works with supercache 5, one prefetechs data, other caches data 2nd time aroundĬlick to expand.If you want to ENSURE that it will always be the best then, yes buy lots of SSD's and use careful placement of the files, but I hate "The alphabet soup game" you have to play. cached known history files to ssd, so loads from ssd first, if ssd fails, no data lost.but only start to work from windows load(so normal hdd loadup via hdd) first Use a ssd for read caching only, like eboostr. Whereas ssd out faster.if data is lost on ssd(corruption) data loss.
Eboostr forum Pc#
If pc does not shut down properly(say gaming) has to flush cache/check.takes up to 5 minutes at blank screen (after intel raid), before loading windows again. than is better than ocz cache ssd+software(crashes offen ocz, no raid support etc) Intel ssd raid cache is much more reliable. Helps cache hdd from boot up/ shutdown.(startup via ssd)